No one wants to believe this is the face of a crazy person. She's not on a street corner carrying a sign for spare change. No. she drives a nice car (that still had gas in it), lives on the Eastside and (no surprise here) has convinced a Washington Family Court that she is the fit parent. So, here's how it works in family court especially this one. Guided by legal counsel (usually one of the junior lackeys of Connolly, Tacon, Meserve or Redford woman's Law most of the time here in Hazard), woman goes into berserk mama bear mode and will do and/or say anything to win the custody war and maximize financial support . "He's abusive", "I have fear of him", "bla bla bla", no facts or evidence will be presented and this court (or any gender biased Washington Court) will side with mom because it profits the state and the court. They actually have the nerve to call that a "Finding and fact of law." I am not exaggerating. So, in defense (which there is none) he may say she has OCD, BPD or is crazy or unstable and the court will say "How dare you, bla bla bla", "she is a woman" "bla bla bla." So, any attempt at getting her mental diagnosis on the table is squashed. It's called a motion for a mental eval or aka (in the legal racket), a "psych eval." The GAL, and any attorney I had, said that a psych eval motion would only enrage the court and hurt my position with them. Like that could get worse . . . I still had/have my testicles. The GAL who saw and called my ex for what she is said; "they don't see anything wrong with her." "No one is ready to hear that because it isn't a popular position and it doesn't pay their bills." So, even though there is at least a three generation mental health/OCD history and there is (by her own admission) a huge hereditary factor with OCD that is exemplified by her behavior and life that mirrors that of her matriarchs, there is no way in a Washington Court you are going to get it on the record. So, the net result is kids who can't see a loving and fit Dad resulting in scars and issues that will last them a lifetime. But, hey, nobody rocked the OCD boat and no woman was made to "feel" uncomfortable by addressing her issues. I've heard or heard of many oral admonishments from Schaller and Indu Thomas on the matter of airing facts that don't shine so well on the female of the species (as they see it). So, as long as mom is comfortable, the Bar union gets paid, and mom gets what she wants from this court, it doesn't matter how many other lives are ruined in the process. In the case of this 2 year old missing Bellevue boy, let's hope he is found and reunited with his dad who appears to be the fit parent in this case. Going forward, would it be too much to ask to get the facts on the table before making a gender biased decision that endangers children and/or ruins father/child relationships? Would it be too much to ask to get this woman (or my ex) the help she needs to live a healthy and balanced life? Is it really realistic to presuppose that every woman is sane (& "perfect in every way") while every man is an abuser? Despite this court's history and track record of following that line of decision making, that still sounds crazy to even say it. But, really now, is that too much to ask from our (we, the people's) officers of the court? If they can't police themselves, would it be too much to ask our elected law makers to start passing some laws reigning this crap and them in? Why is that an outrageous request in this state? Why do we even have to ask?
UPDATES
11-16-11 - Search for Sky moves to Issaquah as father seeks clues (KING5)
Interesting comments thread. The Seattle Times took their comment section down on their stories after the truth about this woman and this DVPO racket was being brought to light.
11-18-11 - I know from friends in Bellevue that the Bellevue police are as top notch a group of cops as there is anywhere. I know they will do their job. But, unfortunately, we also now know how the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office will handle this . . . The P Pass
11-21-11 - Kiro Talk Radio unveils the facts about this case and discuss the gender bias in Family Court and how that failed this unfortunate 2 year old boy.
More audio at MyNorthwest.com
