Saturday, December 27, 2008

and then he snapped on Christmas

Santa gunman was in bitter divorce, lost job (from the USA Today)

Pardo wrote in a legal declaration that he was laid off in July and had been denied state unemployment payments in August. He said he was "desperately seeking" work with many companies. He complained in a court declaration that Sylvia Pardo was living with her parents, not paying rent, and had spent lavishly on a luxury car, gambling trips to Las Vegas, meals at fine restaurants, massages and golf lessons.
Documents from the divorce show Bruce Pardo got their house, which was valued at more than a half-million dollars, but the couple only had $106,000 in equity in it. The mortgage was $2,700 a month, a declaration said.
He complained in a filing that he had monthly expenses of $8,900 and ran a monthly deficit of $2,678.
In June, the court ordered him to pay $1,785 a month in spousal support and put him on a payment plan of $450 a month for $3,570 that was unpaid.
His attorney, Stanley Silver, told The Associated Press his client had trouble making the support payments after he lost his job in July, but spousal support was waived in the settlement last week. Bruce Pardo was trying to pay $10,000 to finalize the divorce proceedings, Silver said, and he never showed any anger or instability.
"All of my dealings with him were always pleasant and cheerful," said Silver, who heard from him last on Tuesday.
Friends and neighbors described Bruce Pardo as a cheerful man who seemed upbeat and doted on a big, brown Akita he owned with his former wife. He stood more than 6 feet tall and was always gentle and kind, said Jan Detanna, head usher at the Holy Redeemer Catholic Church in Montrose, where Pardo volunteered.
Police said Pardo had no criminal record or history of violence, and neighbors and others knew him as a friendly man who walked his dog and was a volunteer usher at his parish church.

. . . and then he SNAPPED but for the court and the Bar association, life goes on.


When will the legislature do something about the family court thugs and law thieves? It is a real wonder this doesn't happen more often. He actually got a better deal than he would have in Thurston/Hazard County. CNN News and Fox News reported that he had his ex's attorney on the list but was too badly burned to finish his list. As reported on the Pundit earlier in the year, seeing an attorney or judge on the list is not surprising. The ex-laws, ok, that's not uncommon. But, his mom? Reportedly, she turned on him too and supported the ex at his trial and was supposed to be at the ex-laws Christmas party where it all went down. Nice mom! So, here's a mild mannered guy who's life was destoyed by the family law racket and feminism, lost his dog, lost his kid and was all alone and, at the end of the day, he was forced into debt, outrageous "support" payments for the ex wife's Vegas trips and had lost his job (likely from the toll of the family court torture process that made some attorneys a lot of money they didn't earn or deserve). Voila, there's your outcome of the Wimmins Movement combined with the racketeering family court. They didn't say there was a restraining order in place. I'm sure that would have made all the difference. Just ask Schaller and Cain about the Roberts family (Case Number: 07-3-00112-4) that they are personally responsible for killing and leaving the kids as orphans. The question in that case isn't how ridiculous and lame Peg Cain's classes are or how absurdly ineffective restraining orders are for those who "snap" or have murder on their mind. No, ask Schaller and Cain how it is they feel about pushing a man to his breaking point for their over inflated egos and for profit. Schaller, Casey and Cain are the biggest bullies on the playground. Regardless, a man wiped of his wealth or anything he had worked for and alone from his only son on Christmas. Gee, what a surprise . . . he snapped. Sad and Tragic. You will all point your grimy little fingers at him. But, one day, the family law racket will have a reckoning. When will the family court abuse be addressed by the lawmakers? That is a rhetorical question because the lawmakers are made up of attorneys. So, the next question is when will the people take up pitch forks and torches to oust the attorneys making the family court laws even more outrageous? Only time will tell.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Alec Baldwin on the Larry King Show

Alec Baldwin's New Book "A Promise to Ourselves" and a good interview on Larry King (see below). His comments are spot on. Thanks Alec for stepping up and spreading the news.

Stop the STOP GRANT Madness (and Thurston, Inc.) Plus, Welcome back Wickham


The Gender Injustice Mission is on the move again. The latest Wa Courts Stop Grant Publication is out.

It’s all about the Gravy Train VAWA dollars. They have given away close to ONE MILLION TAX PAYER DOLLARS to the law thieves since 2001 to strengthen their DV racket. I love the titles by these “public servants” names such as “Honorable” and “Alliance for Justice.” What brand of justice is that? The extortion brand based on gender lies, no evidence and bogus WA Court Sponsored research like Owen Abby and Barbara Lucenko? Look who’s on the list this year. First the usual suspects, Barbara Madsen (A Supreme Court frickin’ Justice). No way that woman should be sitting on the Supreme Court let alone wearing a black robe. She should recuse herself from ALL cases involving a male. Absurd, isn't it? You get the point. Second, Miss “I dictate to the house and senate” show no Grace Huang, and then there’s our very own Chris Wickham, the Pagan Universal Unitarian Socialist. He’s been absent from family court for a few years but is well remembered by all who have had the displeasure of his unjust rulings. His most notable accomplishment while away from anti-family court was his 9 to Zero 1st amendment spanking from the higher court. He did stay active on all the racketeering family law committees and led training for GALs last year in regards to DV. I'm sure his Misandrist rage will be back in full force. Mr. “Gee, I don’t know where that DV Artwork came from” that he brought to the courthouse and failed to disclose on his PDC report for the year as an expendature or a gift. Liar, Liar, pants a blazin’ on fire. There’s some Judicial Canonry for ya! Word has it on the street that Wickham is coming back to family court next year. It will be an All-Star line up of World Class gender bigots at Thurston Juvenile and Family Court next year. It is the A-Team of Misandry; Paula Casey-Handy, Chris Wickham and Christine Schaller-Kradjan..  Stop the madness.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Boston News Channel Reports Extent Of False Accusation Problem

WA DV Press posted a story on the impact and prevalence of the false allegation problem with Restraining Orders as reported on prime time news recently in Boston.

Boston News Video here . . . Boston Channel 5 (link)

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

ANOTHER NEW THURSTON COUNTY WEB SITE

An infrequent contributor to the TCFC Reporter has started a NEW Blog Site of their own dedicated to the Thurston Family Court. It is called the Thurston Family Court Expositor. The Expositor states that it will be compiling actual cases (with cause numbers) for publishing on the web. I applaud their efforts in this regard. This will really help track some of these trends and quantify the obvious biases of this court. The quantification of these trends and collection of individuals could pool into a useful class for future action(s).

Welcome aboard Expositors.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Update to the Joseph Antole Story

Here is an update to the Story of one of our appreciated American Soldiers; Joseph Antole.

On November 20th the Chicago Sun-Times in behalf of president elect Barack Obama mentioned our man of the hour. On its front-page, the newspaper plays in full color the Obama portrait with this banner-line:
His plan to get this Joe out of Iraq and showed a photo of one Sgt. Joseph Antole of Lockport, Illinois, one of 150,000 serving “in the war that divides America.” Thereupon the newspaper’s Scott Fornek writes that Obama (in a sub-head) unveils plan to cut U.S. troops in Iraq.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 a hearing with Commissioner Schaller was held regarding the bruises on Joe's youngest son Joey, noticed first by the mother 3 weeks after Joe left town for training. At the hearing, Commissioner Schaller told Marcella Hughes of the Redford Womens Law firm* (who is currently working
pro-bono for Nina, the Ex) that she needed to come up with more evidence tying the father to the bruises and she would have another hearing on December 11th regarding a restraining order against the children. So essentially we have a mother who is willing to harm her own child, or knows of who is harming her child given the opportunity to bruise her child some more after Joe's visitation and produce the court with more "evidence" that their father is abusive. If Joe had gone in there three weeks after Nina last had the kids and said "look at the bruising on my son from his mother" Schaller would have ripped the children from him that second.

On Sunday, November 30th, little Joey was returned to his dad's home with a whole new set of bruises. Digital photos were emailed to his attorney and to the GAL. Meanwhile, Nina (the Ex) has gotten a prosecutor in Pierce County to press charges for a DV protection order violation. Mr. Antole has submitted several sworn statements and declarations to the Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney's office indicating the false allegations but they are still going to press charges, she's trying to get him convicted because he has another charge suspended in Pierce County for a harassing telephone call to his old neighbors (who introduced his (then) wife to the man that moved into Joe's house while he was gone serving our country) and there is a chance that these false claims will stick. No one wants to believe that a woman would be as evil as she is. Actually, that's all part of the DV legal game. Everyone, including the Black Robe Robber barons, knows it's Bee Ess. But, they need to fill the system with cases and generate fees for their racket. All she wants to do is destroy his life. It’s not about the kids at all. Everyone knows the allegations are false, the GAL has admitted to knowing the allegations are false- but since this woman is working two different counties, everyone involved fears no one is going to see through it. She's even using contact with Joe's new significant other as "third party contact" even though the attorney's agreed to have her as the appointed one who transfers the children. Commissioner Schaller-Kradjen would not grant Joe attorney fees for Nina's claims that Joe "beat" his son Joey 3 weeks after he'd left the state for Heaven's Sake! And now there are MORE bruises on this kid from her household. The Truther would bet if Joey was represented by Con 'Em, Take 'em and Misandry or Schaller’s law firm (Schaller and Foster) that Joe would be getting some attorney fees awarded his way.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Side Notes - As a long time observer of this court,It is absolutely amazing that these false allegation cases are NEVER prosecuted even when proven to be based on PERJURY which is supposed to be a crime (Oh, BTW). No, even in the face of proven lies, they do nothing but reward these women for lying. Schaller and Casey will NEVER force a woman into supervised visitation based solely on the man’s testimony or order a Psychological Evaluation or a Parenting Evaluation that could lead to the woman’s guilt. Clearly, this woman needs a Psych Eval. I’m sure (only my guess) Mr. Antole would agree to a REAL (not a local Thurston Court racketeer) professional to evaluate them both. Judge Wickham told GALs last year that GALs are the “eyes and ear of the court and are critical to making good decisions.” We know that doesn’t apply when it doesn’t suit their feminist, law racketeering fancy as we have seen in so many cases where they exonerate the man.

*footnote (of interest) – The Redford Law Firm is a pro feminist and (admittedly) lesbian law firm known for these kind of cases. They recently replaced Connolly, Tacon and Meserve as counsel of record for another high profile Thurston County false allegation petitioner, Karen L. Fischer. They have also defended Karen L. Fischer (Pro Bono) in a civil law suit and now acting in her defense at the Appeals Court for her no evidence, false allegation DV case Appeal that is pending a decision in Q1 of 2009.  I'm sure their were some federal tax dollars funneled to them in the process, all by "legal" means I'm sure.

Any Excuse works for WOMEN who commit Domestic Violence

Video Courtesy of KSL.com


(KSL News) A woman accused of deliberately running over her husband appeared at a pre-trial hearing today.

The Utah Supreme Court will examine the evidence in the case against Brenda White and determine how far the defense can go in its theory that White suffered from severe emotional distress. White (a blonde) is accused of crashing her SUV (Black Ford Explorer) into her husband's office building in April 2006, hitting him twice. One of his legs was broken, and an ankle was shattered. The justices want to examine if there was any abuse in the relationship (because there has to be an excuse they can fabricate somewhere)

Any excuse works for women who commit Domestic Violence -or- attempted vehicular homicide.