We all know that if you are a male in Thurston and go before this bogus court, you are screwed. We also have seen a very well established pattern of persecution and bias against our military men and Christian men. This is a very typical story of how this court attacks the military. I have more that will be posted in time. One of my favorites is Schaller-Kradjan telling a woman who got pregnant with the meth dealer's baby while the husband was off serving our country that she "has nothing to be ashamed of", "She is a pregnant woman." Schaller's biggest concern was the meth baby knowing the other kids and absolutely no regard for the father/child relationship. Well, that works well for child support too. Never mind the legislature's intent of "Best Interest" or the children's safety. He actually had gotten a temporary, emergency order to take the kids when the court was shown that the women had fantasies and delusions of killing the children. She actually said, "it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when." But when the woman presented her BeeEss and victoomhood, Schaller ordered the kids back to the meth mom to ensure the DSHS DCS dollars were sufficiently covered. In a similar case, involving another military man, several years later she ordered him into a "DV Relapse" program with her fellow racketeer and former client Peg Cain. That was after patronizing their corrupt DV treatment program for years without incident. There was also never any violence or threat of violence to begin with. He was just a big, scary military man and probably had some male control issues so Schaller "found" DV like finding Waldo. I suppose he was "found" to still have at least one testicle in tact. I digress. You will notice another common theme; this court forcing a house into foreclosure and perpetrating financial ruin on innocent, law abiding citizen's lives. On to today's featured story . . .
Disclaimer - This was submitted by somebody knowledgeable of this case and this is not fabricated by the Truther. We are passing this on as written with no edits.
Joseph Antole’s story in a nutshell. TCFC Cause #07-3-01298-3
Joe returned home from his 15-month deployment to Iraq on September 4th 2007. When he got off the plane he was served a protection order signed by Commissioner Christine Schaller preventing him from returning to his home, which he was paying for and restraining him from any contact with his children and wife. His wife Nina, an uneducated waitress had moved her unemployed boyfriend into Joe’s home and decided that it would cramp her style to have Joe come home. So she requested the restraining order on the bogus claim that she was scared to death of Joe killing her and that he had been violent with her in Feb of 2007 when he was home for 2 weeks on R&R.
September 14th 2007 Joe went to court where he was told that the restraining order would stay in effect by Commissioner Schaller claiming that he appeared very angry and that he had been clenching his jaw during his ex-wife’s bogus testimony. The man just returned from a war zone and YEAH he was a little bit pissed to find out that his wife was a whore and that he didn’t have a clue as to the condition his children had been living in. Nina had blown through $18,000 in insurance money with her new boyfriend. The money was paid out due to a grease fire that Nina had started in the home, and the insurance company hired Floor Express to come in and repair the damage, however Nina never paid Floor Express and when Joe returned, there was a lien on his home for that lawsuit as well. At one point Nina was withdrawing $800 a day from Joe’s account before he was able to see his bank statements and cut off her rights to his account.
July of 2007 Joe knew that there was something going on and so he cut off Nina’s rights as power of attorney, however in September 2007, after she put the restraining order in place, she was able to open several accounts in Joe’s name, including one from Direct TV that he had closed 3 years earlier. When Joe tried to pursue charges he was told Det. Roland Weiss that because it was a community property state there was nothing that could be done. By late October of 2007 the home was going into foreclosure because Joe refused to pay the mortgage for a home that he couldn’t live in. Nina was arrested in March of 2008 for a DV charge against her boyfriend at the time at which point she agreed to drop the restraining order on Joe because she needed his help financially and of course she had “never been so scared in her life!” of the boyfriend this time. Her boyfriend at the time however decided not to press charges.
Joe was then able to see his children and ended up getting 50% custody of them in their final divorce agreement in May of 2007, at which point Joe secured his own place. After many failed attempts by Nina to get Joe want her back, she decided that she needed to turn to CPS with some false reports of child abuse which she later ended up admitting were false. The children were in fact issued a temporary safety plan by CPS to be removed from their mother’s custody because of a report turned in by her former roommate Shannon Cooper. However commissioner Schaller did not feel that the mother should be restrained from the children because there was “extensive domestic violence” in the father’s history, she did however admit that the mother was unstable.
Nina then decided to get another restraining order on him in June of 2008. So this time, she and her new boyfriend went to Pierce County and secured a temporary order, again keeping him from his children. At the hearing the judge in Pierce county granted the restraining order stating that there was no need for them to be in contact but that he wanted them to follow the parenting plan lined out, which allowed him 50% custody, or every other week with his children. Nina then decided 2 days after that she was going to go to Thurston County and get another order on him including the children. It was again signed by Commissioner Schaller and they went in for another hearing. Commissioner Schaller did not grant a permanent order because she said that she would not go over another judge’s head. However she did point out that it was “not to say that her court would have made the same decision regarding the parenting plan…”
The latest development as of October 2008 is that he has to re-do his state certified DV classes now because his establishment made an exception (which they are able to according to WAC 388-60-0075) allowing him to finish his one year treatment in less than one year because he is in the military. He completed all 32 classes and the judge ordered that he had to do them all over again for a year even though he's already completed nine months. It’s insane.
His DV assessment was done at Crossroad's in University Place- and the assessment is ver batem the ex's words, so he took up treatment at Daystar Ministries in Tacoma. They are incredibly unorganized and the same day the ex made the false police report, she also called there claiming that he was following her and the director bought right into it and even went as far as faxing an unsworn statement into Marcella Hughes claiming that for "safety reasons" the children should remain with their mother. It was the same day that he'd left his truck at home so he took the sworn statements to them as well and they backtracked like hell. Then when he went to court the GAL stated that there was no basis for restricting his time with the children and that she did not think that the mother's request for supervised visitation was reasonable. She also stated that she did not believe re-treatment was necessary, but the judge ordered it anyway because of the conflicting information that Daystar sent in.
His ex wife continues to drive by his house and harass him whenever possible. He has need to fear her, and it is not the other way around.
PS - NOTE from Truther . . . Thank you Joseph for your service to our country. Hang in there and keep fighting for your rights and your kids. Kids need their dad.
